On June 30, Fb mentioned it could sue 4 Vietnamese people, together with Nguyen Them H., Le Ok., Nguyen Quoc B. and Pham Huu D. for fraud and appropriation of promoting accounts.
In accordance with the world’s largest social media big, the 4 used a method generally known as “session theft” or “cookie theft” to interrupt into the accounts of workers of promoting and advertising companies. . As soon as infiltrated, these individuals will run unauthorized adverts.
This group of individuals add pretend apps “Adverts Supervisor for Fb” to Google Play and trick customers into downloading them. This pretend app requires customers to log in to their Fb promoting account.
As soon as the login info is out there, the phishing group will grant permission to the phishing websites to promote to customers. These pretend apps have now been faraway from Google Play. Earlier than being eliminated, the app had been downloaded greater than 10,000 occasions by the tip of final 12 months.
Moreover defrauding promoting company workers, this group of individuals is accused of supporting on-line scams. In accordance with Fb, it’s estimated that the unlawful adverts this group ran are value greater than $36 million (about greater than 800 billion VND).
Even in Fb’s lawsuit, this social community additionally launched a sequence of images of this group with lavish pleasures, “digital dwelling”.
Fb’s lawsuit cited many images these people posted, from photos of shopping for a sequence of Apple merchandise, happening a cruise, shopping for a Mercedes-Benz, sitting on enterprise class airline tickets, utilizing costly watches. ..
“Throughout 2020 and 2021, the defendant group used the fraudulent proceeds to prepare events, purchase costly automobiles, journey in enterprise class, dine out, and plenty of different bills. they brag about their lives,” Fb wrote within the lawsuit.
Within the lawsuit, Fb requested the Southern California District Courtroom to listen to the allegations in opposition to the defendant. This social community requested judgment to ban the defendant group from accessing the Fb platform, and demanded a compensation of at the very least $ 36 million.
.
