Relating to her wrongdoings Nguyen Phuong HoldJust lately, Binh Duong Provincial Police and Ho Chi Minh Metropolis Police concurrently prosecuted the case “Abusing freedom and democracy to infringe upon the pursuits of the State, the official rights and pursuits of organizations and people. “For this woman. Notably, Ho Chi Minh Metropolis Police have prosecuted the accused. The newest particulars of the case are of explicit curiosity to the general public.
Accordingly, on April 29, the Ho Chi Minh Metropolis Police Investigation Company stated that it was investigating and verifying 11 YouTube channels with indicators of being accomplices with Nguyen Phuong Hold. These channels embody: “Banh mi right here”, “Wandering on the road”, “Regular tales”, “Truc Ngan Vlog”, “Ly shake Vlog”, “Examine In Saigon”, “Tien Vlog”, “” PC Tuan Kiet”, “Rat Rat TV”, “Plain Son”, “Son Xam TV”.
Sharing on Dan Viet, Lawyer Diep Nang Binh, Head of Tinh Thong Luat Regulation Workplace, stated that on this case, not solely Ms. Hold, however another individuals additionally confirmed indicators of serving to, accomplices with Ms. Hold. As a result of throughout the reside broadcast on social networks, numerous youtube channels have broadcast reside to assist Phuong Hold, “unmasking” many artists. Even the homeowners of some youtube channels produce other private insults.
Thus, if the case has sufficient grounds, the homeowners of those channels could also be thought of for legal accountability with the function of accomplices equivalent to those that write articles, share data and associated paperwork, unfold dangerous data. …
As well as, if there are indicators of stealing different individuals’s private data and secrets and techniques by way of web and social media tips to serve the aim of smearing the distinction and dignity of others, they could be prosecuted. contemplate and deal with the crime of “Illegally infiltrating pc networks, telecommunications networks or different individuals’s digital means” based on the provisions of Article 288 of the Penal Code 2015.
In keeping with lawyer Binh, if there are grounds, those that are thought of as accomplices shall be dealt with for the act of “abusing democratic freedoms to infringe upon the pursuits of the State, the official rights and pursuits of organizations and people” based on Article 331 of the 2015 Penal Code, as amended and supplemented in 2017. For this act, the minimal penalty is 6 months in jail, the best is 7 years in jail.
As well as, within the technique of verification and clarification, the police may even contemplate whether or not the conduct of youtube channel homeowners exhibits indicators of slander. If there are sufficient grounds, the homeowners of those channels could proceed to be prosecuted for extra investigation on these indicators of crime. Or change to the crime of humiliating others, defaming the distinction, status, group or particular person.
In keeping with Article 156 of the 2015 Penal Code, the crime of slander may have a minimal jail time period of three months, a most of three years in jail.
